FCH 381 Instrumental Methods of Analysis
Lab Reports
2.)
Introduction (25 pts) This section should contain a brief
background of the methodology used in the lab followed by a statement of the
purpose and goals of the lab. Include
pertinent chemical structures and reactions here.
3.) Method (25 pts) In this section, you should reference the lab handout for details of the experimental method. In addition you should include the following sections (a) standards You should be describe how solutions of the standards were prepared, if this information is not given (or is different) in the lab handout. (b) apparatus Provide a sketch of the instrument used, detailing the essential components. You should also list the instrumental settings that were generally used (e.g., scan speed, wavelength). (c) procedure(s) Describe any procedures that you employed that are different from that described in the lab handout (e.g., sample preparation/collection, derivatization reaction conditions, calibration methods). (d) Describe any sampling procedures (e.g., where the sample was collected and how it was collected).
4.) Results (25 pts) The purpose of this section is to logically present your data and any resultant data analysis that you may have performed. Make sure to use text to present your results (do not only present numbers, calculations, etc). For example, in the chromatography labs you should show sample chromatograms here and label the peaks that you have identified, and identify the chromatograms with a figure number and a written description in the results section. You should also show a graph(s) of your standard curve along with the results of your regression analysis. You should include illustrative calculations to show how you derived values for various parameters (e.g., n). Also include sample calculations to show how concentrations of unknowns were determined. In your calculations, pay attention to the number of significant figures that you report. Also, be careful with your units. Finally, show the calculations for any error analysis that you performed. Don’t forget units!!!
5.) Discussion (25
pts) Here is where you
interpret and discuss your results. What
are potential sources of error in your lab (e.g., contamination)? When appropriate, how do your results compare
to other investigators (i.e., literature values)-- are
they significantly different? For
example, in the spectroscopy lab, you are asked to compare your equilibrium
constant with published values. You should also answer any questions posed at
the end of your lab handout. If you
detected unknowns that were not in your standard then discuss what they might
be. How do your results from week 1 and
week 2 compare (e.g., are the slopes of your standard curves significantly
different?), etc.
Lab reports can be handwritten in your
notebook (except for graphs) or typed as a separate lab report. If you submit hand written lab reports, I expect
them to be legible. Points will be
deducted if we cannot understand what you’ve written. Lab reports are expected
to be handed in on time. Points will be
deducted for late reports. Grading will
be based on content, clarity and neatness.
For the lab reports, I expect you to know how to use Excel (available in
the ESF computer cluster). Again, pay
attention to significant figures. Also
be sure to keep a good, detailed lab notebook.
A well-written lab notebook simplifies that task of writing a lab
report. It is also a permanent record of
what you did in lab.