Dr.
Monica Turner
Ecosystems
Editorial Office
Department
of Zoology, Birge Hall
Re:
Dear
Dr. Turner,
Enclosed
please find two paper copies and one disk copy of our revised manuscript.
Our
responses to the reviewers' few comments are detailed as follows.
Reviewer #1
The
first five comments are exclamations of amazement, not suggestions for
revision.
p.
24, para 3: We
revised our presentation of the review by Johnson and Curtis (2001) to say that
some studies reported increases and others decreases; the average overall
effects were slight.
p.
25, bottom: We added a statement about the value of long-term soil sampling
studies.
Reviewer #2
This
reviewer had only one suggestion, which was to shorten the manuscript by about
1/4. Believe it or not, this document
was once much longer, and after 33 revisions (we number the documents) by 3
authors, we found only modest opportunities remaining for additional cuts. These amounted to about 8% of the length of
the paper.
I
have to say that this is about the nicest set of reviews I have ever received,
which is fitting because it was the best collective writing experience I have
ever had.
Thank
you for your facilitation of the process.
Sincerely
yours,
Ruth
Yanai
Return to Ruth's homepage