Integrated Resources Management
FOR 490
Mondays 12:45 – 4:45pm
313 Bray Hall
Instructor: Teaching Assistant:
Dr. René Germain Frank Cetera
316 Bray Hall 414 Bray Hall
470-6698
Office
Hours: Open Door Policy Office
Hours: TBA
(or by appointment)
The goal of this course is to have students prove their
competency in eight broad subject and skill areas prior to graduation. Students
will show evidence of each of the eight areas through a comprehensive
management plan of a section of
Acquisition and demonstration of knowledge can occur at up to six different levels depending on how one classifies knowledge. The outline presented below is drawn from Bloom’s Taxonomy of Cognitive Levels. The activities listed for each level are measurable and capable of evaluation.
Cognitive Levels Activities
2. Comprehension explain, predict, interpret, infer, summarize, give examples
3. Application apply, solve problems, modify, demonstrate
4. Analysis breakdown material into component parts, describe
interrelationships
5. Synthesis produce something new or original from component parts
6. Evaluation make a judgment based on set of criteria, appraise, judge
The Faculty of
Attendance Policy:
Please see Mr. Slocum in 110 Bray Hall for formal excuses for late work and absences caused by illness, family problems or other legitimate reasons.
Physical Fitness for Field Work:
Each student will be required to participate in field activities under potentially difficult conditions due to terrain and winter weather. Please contact me immediately if you have health issues that may limit your ability to perform in the field.
Student Code of Conduct:
You have all signed an
agreement to abide by the College’s Code of Conduct. As young professionals, I
expect you to act respectfully to me and your classmates.
Each group will be assigned a section of the
i. Note: When writing the report, assume that ESF is no longer the owner
i. Breakdown by species, basal area, stems/ac, relative density, volume (bdft, cords), acceptable growing stock, unacceptable growing stock
ii. Economic assessment of stumpage value (timber valuation)
iii. Note: you must submit all your inventory data files with plan as a separate appendices
i. Hiking activity
ii. Hunting activity
iii. ATV and snow mobile use
i. Define watershed at various spatial scales
ii. Physical soil limitations for operability
iii. Physical soil limitations for plant growth and development
i. Species known to exist on property
i.
ii. Windthrow
iii. Erosion
i. Full-time resident of property (not absentee landowner) with long-term outlook
ii. Primary reason for owning land is recreation
iii. Landowner has a passive attitude towards forest management
iv. No knowledge of forestry but wants what is best for the woodlot
v. Considering timber harvest because they were told it was good for the woodlot, plus could use the money to pay property taxes
vi. The landowner is seeking a recommendation on whether to enroll in the NYS Forest Tax Law (480A). What will this require?
i. The company manages their forestlands to ensure the production of forest products for this and future generations while also providing a diversity of wildlife, clean air and water, soil conservation and recreational opportunities.
ii. The lands are strategic for supplying wood fiber to the mill and creating cash flow.
iii. The company uses both hardwood and softwood species.
iv. The company is seeking a recommendation on whether to become third party certified under the Sustainable Forestry Initiative. What will this require?
i. The Nature Conservancy's mission is to preserve the plants, animals and natural communities that represent the diversity of life on earth by protecting the lands and waters they need to survive.
ii. The Nature Conservancy's vision is to conserve a set of places that, if managed appropriately, will ensure the long-term survival of all their native life and natural communities—not just those that are threatened.
iii. They work with resource-based industries to alter their business practices to have less environmental impact.
iv. They are seeking a recommendation on whether to become third party certified under the Forest Stewardship Council. What will this require?
i. Provide tables with pre- and post-harvest data by species
ii. Discuss management of non-commercial species
iii. Provide harvest schedule for next 20 years
i. Make adjustments for growth and proposed removals
i. Provide detail on harvest system
ii. Provide map of harvest system (landings, roads, skid trails)
i. Specify species
i. Not looking for detailed cost-benefit analysis, but recommendations must be economically viable.
Attendance 10% (Individual)
Draft – Management Plan 15% (Group)
Final – Management Plan 30% (Group)
Class Presentation/Field Interpretation 15% (Group) (bonus pts for early groups)
Class Presentation/Field Interpretation 15% (Individual)
Peer Evaluation 15% (Individual)
Grading
Criteria for Management Plans
Total Points (200)
Background:
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _____(20)
Methods.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _____(20)
Description
of Current Conditions: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. _____(40)
Quality
of Maps. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _____(20)
Management
Recommendations
Writing
(organization, clarity, grammar, references) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _____(25)
Total _______(200)
Class Presentation/Field Interpretation
Date Topic
January 14 Introduction
January 21 No Class – Martin Luther King
January 28
February 4 Review Session – 313 Bray Hall (12:45 – 5:00pm)
· Recreation: Rudy Schuster/Diane Kuehn
· Soils: Russell Briggs
· Silviculture: Ralph Nyland
· Time Value of Money: John Wagner
·
·
·
Watershed Man./Hydrology: Laura Lautz/
February 11
February 18
February 25
March 3 Heiberg
March 10 No Class – Spring Break
March 17 Heiberg
March 24 Workshop
1 –
March 31 Workshop
2 –
April 7 Workshop
3 –
April 14 Workshop
4 –
April 21 Workshop
5 –
April 28 Workshop
6 –
Deliverables:
Draft 1 – Written
Management Plan due by noon on March 24, 2008 (minus 10 pts for each day
late)
Final Draft – Final
Written Management Plan due by noon: April 28, 2008 (minus 10 pts for
each day late)