SUNY ESF
Forest Floor
Forest Floor Data
Data Description | Data | Other | Data | Last Updated by: |
2003 NH and Newcomb | Syracuse Sample Results.xls Jeremy-data-NCB.xls |
8/30/2007 | Andy Friedland | |
1979-1995 chronosequence | 79-95 chronosequence.zip contains: chro.sas chronos bartlett.txt |
5/18/2008 | Ruth | |
untitled.zip (790-80 floors) NH FF depths 2003 .xls FF Depths 1995/Bartlett 1994 |
NH FF 2003 CN results.xls Chronos FF CN summary.xls |
|||
Bartlett documentation .pdf | 4/7/2008 | Ruth | ||
96 total mass by line6-00.XLS | fwd other litter mass 1996.htm | 11/29/2008 | Ruth |
FWD Other Litter Mass 1996
From: rdyanai@syr.edu
Sent: Saturday, November 29, 2008 6:05 AM
To: Dustin Wood; Forest Ecology
Subject: Fwd: other litter mass 1996
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Blue
Attachments: 96 total mass by line6-00.XLS; ATT1512261.htm
Heather, you can archive this under the Chronosequence litterfall study.
Dusty has a graph of litterfall mass by year, stacked by species, which will need
to be corrected for the proper "other" species (we had mistakenly included "other"
masses than leaves, which is what Mary has now corrected). I don't think he should
do anything with it, now; there is still another year to be corrected for "other"
mass. So we just need to make sure we can find it after he's gone and someone else
needs to update it.
We've been waiting for this since last summer! Must be that Mary's semester is winding
up.
Ruth
Great!I'll check with Dusty to make sure that we have his graph archived--assuming you don't finish 1995 before he goes. If you like a target deadline, his last day of work is Dec 12. I think we can assume that my next tech will have to get familiar with these data sets. Or maybe it will go back to BB; he's motivated to finish papers and get an academic job this year.x RuthBegin forwarded message:From: "Arthur, Mary" <marthur@email.uky.edu>Date: November 24, 2008 3:21:05 PM ESTTo: Ruth Yanai <rdyanai@mailbox.syr.edu>Subject: other litter mass 1996Ruth,Here is the 1996 excel file with the litter mass data in it. I have added a column, in bold, for the ‘other’ leaf litter mass. I think it is safe to assume that this litter is a conglomeration of the other species, and treat it accordingly in terms of chemistry. I will now work with the 1995 litter data set. This one is more complicated, because we found only one of the sample dates.MaryMary A. ArthurProfessor of Forest EcologyDepartment of Forestry103 TP Cooper BuildingUniversity of KentuckyLexington, KY 40546-0073Email: mary.arthur@uky.eduPhone: 859.257.2852Fax: 859.323.1031