Forest Ecosystem Science Laboratory
Data Catalog - Site, vegetation, and sample

From: Dustin Michael Wood <dmwood@syr.edu>

Date: February 24, 2009 8:00:34 AM EST

To: Ruth Yanai <rdyanai@syr.edu>

Cc: Byung Bae Park <ecobbp@hotmail.com>

Subject: Re: Fwd: This mail was in my computer for several days!

 

BB,

I didn't use excel files to create the figures, so I'm sending along my Sigma Plot files in a zipped folder, including the file for the correct figure 3. I think figure numbers changed sometime after I created the sigma plot files, so please take a look at the other sigma plot files in this folder if the figure 3 file isn't correct. I don't have sigma plot installed on this computer, or else I would look myself. I hope this helps!

Ruth,

These files probably could be archived. I think Jim Halligan told me that my e-mail account with syr  is permanent, but who knows. My other e-mail address is dustin.wood@fountainsamerica.com. I can only access this account from my office computer, but we can worry about that when my syr.edu account goes down. I prefer the syr.edu account anyway. My schedule is pretty full until Friday after 5:00.

Dusty

Quoting Ruth Yanai <rdyanai@syr.edu>:

I found BB's e-mail!  It came from a different e-mail address and was
alphabetized in Korean.  --Ruth
Dusty, should we be using a different e-mail address for you?  syr.edu
will cut you off at some point.

Begin forwarded message:
From: "박병배" <bbpark@forest.go.kr>
Date: February 19, 2009 8:04:36 PM EST
To: dmwood@syr.edu, rdyanai@syr.edu
Subject: This mail was in my computer for several days!
 Hi Dusty,

I wanted to get the files for mass. I think figure number was not  correct!
If you have data files (or Sigma plot files), please send them for   
Figure 1 and Figure 3.
I am attaching the v28 for figure number.
----- Original Message -----
From: Dustin Michael Wood
To: rdyanai@syr.edu
Cc: Byung Bae Park
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 9:03 AM
Subject: Re: Fwd: litterfall chem and masses

Ruth,
I've attached the litterfall figure 3, in hope that we are looking at the same one. I don't have an excel file for this figure, because  I believe I made the graph from several files, each one containing a  different year's data. I will attach the sigma plot file I used,  which does have everything in it, but of course you won't be able to  read the file unless you are on the lab computer. 
I can send  you  the excel files for each year of data, though I'm sure you already  have them, because I can remember you forwarding some of them to me.
I hope that helps! Sorry for the delay, as usual.
 Dusty
Quoting rdyanai@syr.edu:

Dusty, is the excel file for figure 3 in the litterfall paper available in our document archive?  BB, do you know about this archive?  It should be a goal to bring the litterfall data up to  date (we documented an excel file in Dec 07, which doesn't have the  latest "other" species).
Mary was telling us that the "other" species need to be  partitioned to real species so we can give them concentrations.  We should just assign them in proportion to the measured species.  It's not a lot  of
material.
How to assign concentrations when we have no data is a bigger  problem.
x Ruth

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Byung Bae Park" <ecobbp@hotmail.com>
Date: February 10, 2009 9:26:46 PM EST
To: <rdyanai@syr.edu>
Subject: Re: litterfall chem and m! asses

For Huntington paper, you'd better begin revising it if you have  time.
If you leave something for me, I can take them as soon as possible. I am under a few urgent reports everyday! It's not my time, which I can manage. Nowadays, I think national research institutes are not good for researchers. They have money, but no time! This is one of reason to
move to academic area!
 "Mary asked if you understood her correction for the mass for the missing summer 1994 (to be added to fall 1993).  Her spreadsheet  ("93 mass by line.xls") has 5.5% added to all sites.  This mass has to  be partitioned to species before we can use species concentrations  to get
the total flux.  She sent us a new version of this spreadsheet,  with a correction to o! ne of the labels (about dates)."
 In above para graph, I don't understand "This mass has to be partitioned to species before we can use species concentrations  to get the total flux.".
My understanding for this sentence is we need contents after changing mass. If so, please send excel file for figure 3 in version28. It's easy way! How about using weighted-concentrations for concentrations for others? If my understanding is not correct, please let me know.
BB (Byung Bae) Park, Ph.D.

Korea Forest Research Institute
Division of Forest Conservation
207, Cheongyangni 2-dong
Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-712
South Korea

Tel: +82 2 961 2645
Fax: +82 2 961 2649
Mobile: +82 10 3649 3389
Email: bbpark@foa.go.kr or
ecobbp@hotmail.com